No Go Daddy!

How GoDaddy Suspended my Cash Parking Account


Godaddy V Father Dave Round 5

Round 5

Having been told that I wasn't being accused of anything, I thought it had to be worth asking why then I was being punished, such that my account had been permanently suspended and all my earnings had been withheld?

GoDaddy had made it clear in previous correspondence that I was not to be given any opportunity to prove my innocence or even to discuss it, but I figured it had to be worth querying them at least on this point of procedure - one that seemed to violate every known law of justice.

From: "Rev. David B. Smith"
Date: Fri, November 30th, 2007 3:42 pm

Thank you for your email, but unfortunately it has only confused me further. Again I must ask for clarification.

It now seems that you are NOT accusing me of any fraudulent behaviour.

Indeed, you seem to be suggesting that the only reason you are not forwarding on monies that would have otherwise been paid to me is that they have not been forwarded to you by Google.

This may explain why you are not making good with any payments this month, but it does not explain why you are withholding all monies due from previous months, nor does it explain why you have permanently suspended my account. Indeed, if I am not being accused of any misdemeanor, it is hard to understand why I am being punished?

Having said that, I did not ask for an explanation, and let me repeat that I am not contesting your decision (since, as you have pointed out, it would be in violation of the terms and conditions to do so). I am only seeking clarification of the situation.

As I understand it now from your most recent email:

  1. 1. I am not being accused of any misdemeanor
  2. 2. All monies due to me have nonetheless been withheld
  3. 3. My account has been permanently suspended
  4. 4. I am not permitted to argue the case.

Again, if this is correct, a simple 'yes' will suffice, to show that I have understood the situation correctly.

I would again request that you do me the courtesy of including your name when you reply to me.

Further, I would again ask if you could give me the name and contact details of somebody more senior in managment with whom I might discuss the terms and conditions of the company.

Let me reitterate that my concern is NOT to argue my case. My concern is with the far more serious questions arising from the way your company does business.

If you could forward me to an appopriate person in management, I would be grateful. Perhaps, if your company has a chaplain, you could forward me to that person. I myself am a company chaplain, so this would seem appropriate. Having said that, anybody who is authorised to include their name in their correspondence will be sufficient for the moment.

Thank you for your cooperation

Rev. David B. Smith

Rev. David B. Smith, B.A. (Hons), B.Th., Dip.A.
Registered Professional Boxer, 6th Degree Black Belt
Acting Rector, Holy Trinity Dulwich Hill
Managing Director, Fighting Fathers Ministries Pty. Ltd.
President, Australian Federation of Pankration Athlima
Nominated 'Ausralian of the Year' 2005

I waited until after Christmas. I didn't receive a reply ...

Godaddy V Father Dave Round 4

Godaddy V Father Dave Round 8
I had been finished with the two-shot combinat...

Godaddy V Father Dave Round 3
I thought I'd also include Google in the query, as Godaddy had encouraged me to do so. I didn't receive any ...

Godaddy V Father Dave Round 2

Godaddy V Father Dave Round 7
I therefore replied yet again and mapped out my questions yet again:...

Godaddy V Father Dave Round 6
This was now my third attempt to seek clarifi...

Godaddy V Father Dave Round 1
This was the initial blow. It was a right hook to the jaw that I didn't see coming at all. I had ...



Site Menu


More Articles